Re: First draft list of 2.3.x "Things to fix"

[Alan Cox]

> Sorry. If it's stable - it is. If it isn't - including it into official
> stable tree is a _real_ shame. Especially if the rationale is getting

There are two things to distinguish

1.	Stable	- works, doesnt eat your disk
2.	Fit to go into the main kernel
	- This adds the requirement "cleanly modular"
				    "provides a common core that works with other users"

> still... Such things reek with Big Blue. Besides, let SCT decide at which
> point he will consider it OK for inclusion into -stable. AFAICS nothing

I talk to Stephen several times a day