Re: 2.3.36-pre on SPARC

Anton Blanchard (anton@progsoc.uts.edu.au)
Wed, 5 Jan 2000 22:44:02 +1100


> from looking at the CVS tree and the latest pre-patch it looks as if
> the two are back in sync WRT the SPARC architecture. Am i correct?

Even though they are in sync, only sun4c has a chance of running (once
procfs is fixed to not assume alloc_task == get_free_pages).

> Simply omitting "__flush_dcache_range()" and applying step 1 and 2 gives me
> a clean compile up to srmmu.c...

We are working on srmmu right at the moment :)

Anton

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/