Re: (*(unsigned long *)&jiffies)++;

Andrea Arcangeli (andrea@suse.de)
Thu, 6 Jan 2000 19:29:11 +0100 (CET)


On Thu, 6 Jan 2000, Tigran Aivazian wrote:

>what's wrong with using existing atomic_XXX() macros? They are explicitly

The correct code is the current one or jiffies++. If you want to go faster
this time you should hack the compiler (to use incl) and not the kernel :).

Andrea

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/