Re: time_t size: The year 2038 bug?

David Wragg (dpw@doc.ic.ac.uk)
08 Jan 2000 00:11:09 +0000

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Patrick J. LoPresti: "Re: Determining address which caused SEGV"
Previous message: Jamie Lokier: "Re: Determining address which caused SEGV"
Maybe in reply to: doug@springer.net: "time_t size: The year 2038 bug?"
Next in thread: David Wragg: "Re: time_t size: The year 2038 bug?"

Jesse Pollard <pollard@tomcat.admin.navo.hpc.mil> writes:
> And even then it is limited to 64 bits on a 64 bit system (unless the
> compiler is non-standard - ie "long long" type of thing).

long long is in ISO/ANSI C99.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Patrick J. LoPresti: "Re: Determining address which caused SEGV"
Previous message: Jamie Lokier: "Re: Determining address which caused SEGV"
Maybe in reply to: doug@springer.net: "time_t size: The year 2038 bug?"
Next in thread: David Wragg: "Re: time_t size: The year 2038 bug?"