I see you deleted the actual quote and presented a revised statement. I
think those who read the original statement can figure out what it said.
>
> Finally, the whole point is to end up with one sort of cable used
> for connecting machines to machines and machines to drives. Yeah,
> it's a stretch, but that is the sort of thing that gets my attention.
>
> This all reminds me very much of when I was running around Sun saying that
> we ought to be trying to make ethernet run at 100Mbits.
And Al Gore invented the Internet.
> At the time,
> people like Karen were calmly explaining how there was no standard, how
> the industry didn't work that way, how FDDI was better anyway, etc., etc.
> Didn't slow me down one bit. There will always be people who stand in the
> way of change - they fear it,
I never mentioned FDDI, you love to put words in other people's mouths.
Those who know me would tell you I am far too much focused on change,
rather than maintaining the staus quo. You know nothing about me--so why
make it up? Will that distract from the succinct literal meaning of the
words you have posted? You often change the topic, when you bump into a
wall. No doubt many are aware of this without me literally stating it.
I have no direct interest in this at all. I do have relevant knowledge.
These ideas are not new inside the disk drive industry. Anyone who believes
this discussion is breaking new ground is deluding themself.
Karen
-- ---- Karen Shaeffer Neuralscape; (831) 426-8547 Santa Cruz, Ca. 95060 shaeffer@neuralscape.com http://www.neuralscape.com -------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/