Re: Scheduled Transfer Protocol on Linux
Matthew Jacob (mjacob@feral.com)
Sun, 13 Feb 2000 16:38:58 -0800 (PST)
>
> Yes, I can see market for such beasts. Right now the de-facto
> model for "networked" disks is FiberChannel.
>
> How exactly would STP interface differ from FC ?
> E.g. how STP would be better than FC ?
Less massive protocol management.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/