Re: why does mtrr use suser() and not capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN)?

[Tigran Aivazian]

On Wed, 16 Feb 2000, Richard Gooch wrote:
> 
> So I'd rather that MTRR was left alone until the house of capabilities
> is cleaned up.
> 
Sorry Richard, but I was fiddling with mtrr.c for P6 ucode stuff so I
couldn't stand the temptation to cleanup the suser->capable bits. However,
if you feel strongly about it, surely Linus can ignore that part of my
patch :)

Regards,
Tigran.