Re: Testers wanted! (was Re: "movb" for spin-unlock)

Alex Buell (alex.buell@tahallah.clara.co.uk)
Mon, 24 Apr 2000 10:54:57 +0100 (BST)

On Sun, 23 Apr 2000, Oliver Xymoron wrote:

> Anyone with a dual x86, please give this a quick run. I want to hear
> about any failures (it'll abort with "state was 1!") and if you have a
> PPro with a stepping of less than 9 (which have been rumored to have a
> problem with this), tell me about your successes as well. Send me a
> copy of your /proc/cpuinfo too. If we can get a solid set of success
> reports for early P6s and no failures elsewhere, perhaps we can get
> this faster locking method into the kernel.

With the new program, with MOVB defined, completes successfully, with MOVB
undefined, completes successfully. Both works. Hmm! Using gcc 2.95.2,
glibc 2.1.3 w/linuxthreads.

Here's my /proc/cpuinfo

processor : 0
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 1
model name : Pentium Pro
stepping : 7
cpu MHz : 166.194480
cache size : 512 KB
fdiv_bug : no
hlt_bug : no
sep_bug : no
f00f_bug : no
coma_bug : no
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 2
wp : yes
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov
bogomips : 165.89

processor : 1
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 1
model name : Pentium Pro
stepping : 7
cpu MHz : 166.194480
cache size : 512 KB
fdiv_bug : no
hlt_bug : no
sep_bug : no
f00f_bug : no
coma_bug : no
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 2
wp : yes
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov
bogomips : 165.89

Cheers,
Alex

-- 
You only need two things to get through life: a hug and a shrug


http://www.tahallah.clara.co.uk




-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/