Re: lockless poll() (was Re: namei() query)

willy@thepuffingroup.com
Mon, 24 Apr 2000 15:28:20 -0400

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Ville Herva: "Re: "movb" for spin-unlock (was Re: namei() query)"
Previous message: Manfred Spraul: "[PATCH] optimization for fixed size kmalloc()"
In reply to: kumon@flab.fujitsu.co.jp: "lockless poll() (was Re: namei() query)"
Next in thread: Manfred Spraul: "Re: lockless poll() (was Re: namei() query)"

On Mon, Apr 24, 2000 at 09:36:00PM +0900, kumon@flab.fujitsu.co.jp wrote:
> # now do_close is the top of stext-lock..

Someone (I think Al Viro?) claimed that a large amount of this time was
taken inside the file locking code. If so, that's about to go way down.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Ville Herva: "Re: "movb" for spin-unlock (was Re: namei() query)"
Previous message: Manfred Spraul: "[PATCH] optimization for fixed size kmalloc()"
In reply to: kumon@flab.fujitsu.co.jp: "lockless poll() (was Re: namei() query)"
Next in thread: Manfred Spraul: "Re: lockless poll() (was Re: namei() query)"