Linux-kernel mailing list archive 2000-23,: Re: Syscall number allocation

# Re: Syscall number allocation

Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Sun, 4 Jun 2000 01:28:12 +0100 (BST)

- Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
- Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: some questions about descriptors"
- Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: How to sleep a kernel thread?"
- Next in thread: Josh Huber: "Re: Syscall number allocation"
- Reply: Josh Huber: "Re: Syscall number allocation"

> I'm told that Linus is somewhat anti debugging systems in the kernel, so it
> seems like the only route to make using our system and painless as possible
> would be to have system call entries marked as unimplemented, which would be
> filled in when you apply our patch.

Why does it need to be a syscall ?

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

- Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: some questions about descriptors"
- Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: How to sleep a kernel thread?"
- Next in thread: Josh Huber: "Re: Syscall number allocation"
- Reply: Josh Huber: "Re: Syscall number allocation"