Linux-kernel mailing list archive 2000-23,: Re: OS stopping stack buffer overflow exploits

# Re: OS stopping stack buffer overflow exploits

Peter T. Breuer (ptb@it.uc3m.es)
Sun, 4 Jun 2000 12:42:30 +0200 (MET DST)

- Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
- Next message: Dan Hollis: "Re: Mobo dying hard with DMA support"
- Previous message: Florian Weimer: "Re: OS stopping stack buffer overflow exploits"
- Next in thread: Florian Weimer: "Re: OS stopping stack buffer overflow exploits"
- Reply: Florian Weimer: "Re: OS stopping stack buffer overflow exploits"
- Reply: yoann@mandrakesoft.com: "Re: OS stopping stack buffer overflow exploits"

"A month of sundays ago Florian Weimer wrote:"
> The C and C++ frontends only generate trampolines if you use a GNU
> extension (nested functions).

And I have no idea why they should want to: nesting is purely a
question of namespaces and syntactic scoping. It should impact
the implementation semantics not at all.

Peter

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

- Next message: Dan Hollis: "Re: Mobo dying hard with DMA support"
- Previous message: Florian Weimer: "Re: OS stopping stack buffer overflow exploits"
- Next in thread: Florian Weimer: "Re: OS stopping stack buffer overflow exploits"
- Reply: Florian Weimer: "Re: OS stopping stack buffer overflow exploits"
- Reply: yoann@mandrakesoft.com: "Re: OS stopping stack buffer overflow exploits"