Linux-kernel mailing list archive 2000-23,: Re: queue_task()

# Re: queue_task()

Siddharth Kashyap (sid_kashyap@hotmail.com)
Sun, 04 Jun 2000 17:53:06 EDT

- Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
- Next message: Jesse Pollard: "Re: OS stopping stack buffer overflow exploits"
- Previous message: Malware: "Re: ip_dynaddr broken in 2.4.0-test1 ?"
- Maybe in reply to: Siddharth Kashyap: "queue_task()"

Hi,

Thanks for the reply. I tried to compile my module with the same
configurations as I do my system modules with. However no luck!

Any more suggestions would be apprecited.

Thanks,
Siddharth Kashyap.

>From: Steve Dodd <steved@loth.demon.co.uk>
>To: Siddharth Kashyap <sid_kashyap@hotmail.com>
>CC: linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu
>Subject: Re: queue_task()
>Date: Sun, 4 Jun 2000 19:52:46 +0100
>
>On Sun, Jun 04, 2000 at 12:19:49PM -0400, Siddharth Kashyap wrote:
>
>[..]
> > The problem is that every time I try to insert the module I get the
> > following error message:
> >
> > "unresolved sysmbol"
> >
> > Can someone help me on this please.
>
>Probably a CONFIG_MODVERSIONS thing. If you set that option when you built
>your kernel, you need to compile your module with the same compiler options
>that the kernel uses when building modules, something like
>
>-DMODULE -DMODVERSIONS -include
>$(LINUX_SRC_DIR)/include/linux/modversions.h
>
>usually.

________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

- Next message: Jesse Pollard: "Re: OS stopping stack buffer overflow exploits"
- Previous message: Malware: "Re: ip_dynaddr broken in 2.4.0-test1 ?"
- Maybe in reply to: Siddharth Kashyap: "queue_task()"