Alan Cox wrote:
>
> > I disagree. As long as the version in 2.4 is bugfixed, I see no problem with
> > that.
>
> Rik is probably right. One thing we try very hard to do is to ensure you can
> always go backwards. 2.2.15 for example does nothing to your box that means
> you cannot go back to 2.2.0.
What? so you mean to go backwards from 2.4 to 2.2? This is crazy!
Try to go from 2.0 to 1.2 or from 2.2 to 2.0..... and you will see interesting
things.
Get your RedHat 6.2 and plug in a 2.0 kernel and then even winblows will seem
stable in comparison!
Please Alan, think twice. :-)
--------------884B890C20107C85668160B4
Content-Type: text/x-vcard; charset=us-ascii;
name="manolow.vcf"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Description: Card for Manuel J. Galan Moreno
Content-Disposition: attachment;
filename="manolow.vcf"
begin:vcard
n:Galan Moreno;Manuel
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
org:E.T.S. Arquitectura ULPGC;Matematicas
adr;quoted-printable:;;Edif. de Arquitectura=0D=0ACampus Universitario de Tafira Baja=0D=0A35017, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria=0D=0ASPAIN;;;;
adr:;;;;;;
version:2.1
email;internet:manolow@step.es
title:Profesor
x-mozilla-cpt:;0
fn:Manuel Galan Moreno
end:vcard
--------------884B890C20107C85668160B4--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/