Re: ULTRA ATA/100 announced

=?ISO-8859-1?Q?G=E9rard_Roudier?= (groudier@club-internet.fr)
Tue, 6 Jun 2000 00:13:29 +0200 (CEST)


On Mon, 5 Jun 2000, Dan Hollis wrote:

> On Mon, 5 Jun 2000, Stephen Frost wrote:
> > On Mon, 5 Jun 2000, Stephen Torri wrote:
> > > If we get ATA/100 then why buy SCSI?
> > There are reasons. There always have been, I doubt that will
> > change.
>
> Those reasons are slowly disappearing however...

What reasons?

Let ATA switch to LVD and it would reinvent SCSI Ultra2 and possibly
Ultra-160. ATA looks more and more like kind of inferior SCSI for poor or
stingy people as Windows has been the O/S for clueless people. Add
Windows+ATA and result is to computer technology what Mac Donald is to
cooking (I mean inferior plaggiarism that is just shit^H^Hame compared to
original).

Gérard.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/