Linux-kernel mailing list archive 2000-23,: Re: (reiserfs) Re: New Linux 2.5 - 2.6 TODO (Alan Cox suggestsdelaying

# Re: (reiserfs) Re: New Linux 2.5 - 2.6 TODO (Alan Cox suggestsdelaying

Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Tue, 6 Jun 2000 12:50:37 +0100 (BST)

- Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
- Next message: Lars Knudsen: "Re: (reiserfs) Re: New Linux 2.5 - 2.6 TODO (Alan Cox suggestsdelaying"
- Previous message: Christoph Rohland: "[Patch] get db2 (finally) working again with shm fs"
- Next in thread: Andi Kleen: "Re: (reiserfs) Re: New Linux 2.5 - 2.6 TODO (Alan Cox suggestsdelaying"
- Reply: Andi Kleen: "Re: (reiserfs) Re: New Linux 2.5 - 2.6 TODO (Alan Cox suggestsdelaying"
- Reply: Stephen C. Tweedie: "Re: (reiserfs) Re: New Linux 2.5 - 2.6 TODO (Alan Cox suggestsdelaying"

> I would have used a global hook (register_memory_pressure_handler())
> Hmm, ok a super block vector would do too, but the global hook would
> be probably useful for other things too (e.g. networking could use it for
> its skb caches). Block device interface has nothing to do with the VFS
> imho (you may be using a different definition of VFS than me tho)

A notifier chain seems the obvious thing to use for it then ?

>

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

- Next message: Lars Knudsen: "Re: (reiserfs) Re: New Linux 2.5 - 2.6 TODO (Alan Cox suggestsdelaying"
- Previous message: Christoph Rohland: "[Patch] get db2 (finally) working again with shm fs"
- Next in thread: Andi Kleen: "Re: (reiserfs) Re: New Linux 2.5 - 2.6 TODO (Alan Cox suggestsdelaying"
- Reply: Andi Kleen: "Re: (reiserfs) Re: New Linux 2.5 - 2.6 TODO (Alan Cox suggestsdelaying"
- Reply: Stephen C. Tweedie: "Re: (reiserfs) Re: New Linux 2.5 - 2.6 TODO (Alan Cox suggestsdelaying"