Linux-kernel mailing list archive 2000-23,: Re: (reiserfs) Re: New Linux 2.5 - 2.6 TODO (Alan Cox

# Re: (reiserfs) Re: New Linux 2.5 - 2.6 TODO (Alan Cox

Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Tue, 6 Jun 2000 14:48:16 +0100 (BST)

- Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
- Next message: Mark Kettenis: "Re: _fpstate_fxsave & al"
- Previous message: Anthony Barbachan: "Re: ULTRA ATA/100 announced"
- Next in thread: Matthew Kirkwood: "Re: (reiserfs) Re: New Linux 2.5 - 2.6 TODO (Alan Cox"
- Reply: Matthew Kirkwood: "Re: (reiserfs) Re: New Linux 2.5 - 2.6 TODO (Alan Cox"

> Are there any reasons beyond "playing fair" and potentially
> making a merge of new journalling code slightly harder that
> none at all of these should be allowed in?

A desire to ship 2.4 in the near timescale, and the fact that given this
only Linus can make the call as to adding any of these

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

- Next message: Mark Kettenis: "Re: _fpstate_fxsave & al"
- Previous message: Anthony Barbachan: "Re: ULTRA ATA/100 announced"
- Next in thread: Matthew Kirkwood: "Re: (reiserfs) Re: New Linux 2.5 - 2.6 TODO (Alan Cox"
- Reply: Matthew Kirkwood: "Re: (reiserfs) Re: New Linux 2.5 - 2.6 TODO (Alan Cox"