Linux-kernel mailing list archive 2000-23,: Re: (reiserfs) Re: New Linux 2.5 - 2.6 TODO (Alan Cox

# Re: (reiserfs) Re: New Linux 2.5 - 2.6 TODO (Alan Cox

Matthew Kirkwood (weejock@ferret.lmh.ox.ac.uk)
Tue, 6 Jun 2000 15:29:35 +0100 (BST)

- Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
- Next message: Chris Mason: "Re: New Linux 2.5 - 2.6 TODO (Alan Cox suggestsdelaying"
- Previous message: Andre Hedrick: "Re: ULTRA ATA/100 announced"
- In reply to: Alan Cox: "Re: (reiserfs) Re: New Linux 2.5 - 2.6 TODO (Alan Cox"

On Tue, 6 Jun 2000, Alan Cox wrote:

> > Are there any reasons beyond "playing fair" and potentially
> > making a merge of new journalling code slightly harder that
> > none at all of these should be allowed in?
>
> A desire to ship 2.4 in the near timescale,

Pint taken.

> and the fact that given this only Linus can make the call as to adding
> any of these

Good.

I shall now retire from this thread, and encourage others to
do so :-)

Matthew.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

- Next message: Chris Mason: "Re: New Linux 2.5 - 2.6 TODO (Alan Cox suggestsdelaying"
- Previous message: Andre Hedrick: "Re: ULTRA ATA/100 announced"
- In reply to: Alan Cox: "Re: (reiserfs) Re: New Linux 2.5 - 2.6 TODO (Alan Cox"