Linux-kernel mailing list archive 2000-23,: Re: (reiserfs) Re: New Linux 2.5 - 2.6 TODO (Alan Cox suggests delaying reiserfs integration)

# Re: (reiserfs) Re: New Linux 2.5 - 2.6 TODO (Alan Cox suggests delaying reiserfs integration)

Stephen C. Tweedie (sct@redhat.com)
Tue, 6 Jun 2000 16:52:03 +0100

- Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
- Next message: James Sutherland: "Re: (reiserfs) Re: New Linux 2.5 - 2.6 TODO (Alan Cox suggestsdelaying"
- Previous message: Stephen C. Tweedie: "Re: (reiserfs) Re: New Linux 2.5 - 2.6 TODO (Alan Cox suggests delaying reiserfs integration)"
- In reply to: Andreas Dilger: "Re: (reiserfs) Re: New Linux 2.5 - 2.6 TODO (Alan Cox suggests delaying"

Hi,

On Mon, Jun 05, 2000 at 01:35:57PM -0600, Andreas Dilger wrote:
>
> Yes, it is possible to have a dedicated log device, although it is not
> currently used.

Right --- the API was designed for that from scratch, but it's not
implemented right now. That's almost certainly a post-1.0 feature,
especially as you really want to be able to have multiple filesystems
sharing that dedicated journal disk (probably using raid1 on the
journal).

--Stephen

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

- Next message: James Sutherland: "Re: (reiserfs) Re: New Linux 2.5 - 2.6 TODO (Alan Cox suggestsdelaying"
- Previous message: Stephen C. Tweedie: "Re: (reiserfs) Re: New Linux 2.5 - 2.6 TODO (Alan Cox suggests delaying reiserfs integration)"
- In reply to: Andreas Dilger: "Re: (reiserfs) Re: New Linux 2.5 - 2.6 TODO (Alan Cox suggests delaying"