Linux-kernel mailing list archive 2000-23,: Re: little PPC problem, but found hackish solutions

# Re: little PPC problem, but found hackish solutions

Andreas Tobler (toa@pop.agri.ch)
Wed, 07 Jun 2000 16:13:16 +0200

- Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
- Next message: Richard B. Johnson: "Re: Why reassert ix86 NMI?"
- Previous message: Jamie Lokier: "Re: PATCH 2.4.0.1.ac10: a KISS memory pressure callback"
- Maybe in reply to: Bastien Noscera: "little PPC problem, but found hackish solutions"
- Next in thread: Andreas Tobler: "Re: little PPC problem, but found hackish solutions"

"Bastien Noscera (ETL)" wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I just compiled the 2.4.0-test1 on my iMac (PPC/USB) and got it running although it appeared this nasty message:
> arch/ppc/kernel/kernel.o(__ksymtab+0x3f8): undefined reference to `debugger'
> arch/ppc/kernel/kernel.o(__ksymtab+0x400): undefined reference to `debugger_bpt'
> arch/ppc/kernel/kernel.o(__ksymtab+0x408): undefined reference to `debugger_sstep'
> arch/ppc/kernel/kernel.o(__ksymtab+0x410): undefined reference to `debugger_iabr_match'
> arch/ppc/kernel/kernel.o(__ksymtab+0x418): undefined reference to `debugger_dabr_match'
> arch/ppc/kernel/kernel.o(__ksymtab+0x420): undefined reference to `debugger_fault_handler'
>
> I got rid of it, removing the exports symbols and declarations in arch/ppc/kernel/ppc_ksyms.c. What is it ? I think it's hooks for gdb, or is it kgdb ?
>
> I'm also having problems with the USB-HID mouse driver, under XF68_FBDev (don't use GPM), I've got to unplug-replug the mouse and it's working again.
>
> On a sidenote, thanks to Alan for giving me an hint about using gcc-2.95, it works perfectly. And much thanks to everybody > who contributed to this forthcoming 2.4.

You musn't remove anything, just enable xmon under Kernel hacking. An
enabled xmon (pmac kernel dbg) is alway good on devel kernels.

Andreas

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

- Next message: Richard B. Johnson: "Re: Why reassert ix86 NMI?"
- Previous message: Jamie Lokier: "Re: PATCH 2.4.0.1.ac10: a KISS memory pressure callback"
- Maybe in reply to: Bastien Noscera: "little PPC problem, but found hackish solutions"
- Next in thread: Andreas Tobler: "Re: little PPC problem, but found hackish solutions"