> Tigran Aivazian <tigran@veritas.com> writes:
> > didn't Peter Anvin say recently that the reason the internal mount
> > instance of shmfs is mounted on "/" is todo with POSIX IPC
> > requirements that any object should correspond to a "real pathname"?
>
> No, to use POSIX shm you have to mount it into the real tree.
>
Cool. How about procfs being currently mounted on "/" - can this also be
fixed to become "proc:"?
Regards,
Tigran
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/