Linux-kernel mailing list archive 2000-23,: Re: shm fs mount

# Re: shm fs mount

Alexander Viro (viro@math.psu.edu)
Sat, 10 Jun 2000 15:02:50 -0400 (EDT)

- Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
- Next message: Hans Reiser: "Re: (reiserfs) Re: New Linux 2.5 - 2.6 TODO (Alan Cox suggestsdelaying"
- Previous message: Ed Carp: "Re: Red Hat (was Re: reiserfs)"
- In reply to: Alan Cox: "Re: shm fs mount"

On Fri, 9 Jun 2000, Alan Cox wrote:

> > Alex, couldn't we use a mount point like the pipefs so the glibc
> > parser could easily detect the internal mount?
>
> I would say the internal one shouldnt be visisble or should say 'none' for
> where it is mounted. This however isnt my code area - Al ?

Hey, whatever - I prefer to see it in /proc/mounts while I'm debugging the
stuff (until we get per-process namespaces, that is - after that it's
definitely out). Weeding these out of /proc/mounts is trivial and kernel
couldn't care less for them, so it's a userland problem and nothing else.
If somebody wants it out - just say and I'll take them out.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

- Next message: Hans Reiser: "Re: (reiserfs) Re: New Linux 2.5 - 2.6 TODO (Alan Cox suggestsdelaying"
- Previous message: Ed Carp: "Re: Red Hat (was Re: reiserfs)"
- In reply to: Alan Cox: "Re: shm fs mount"