Linux-kernel mailing list archive 2000-29,: Re: The big IDE fight in a different light

# Re: The big IDE fight in a different light

Stephen Frost (sfrost@ns.snowman.net)
Fri, 21 Jul 2000 14:01:26 -0400 (EDT)

- Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
- Next message: Johannes Erdfelt: "Re: TO HELL WITH IT THEN......(re: disk-destroyer.c)"
- Previous message: Linda Walsh: "RE: Cache coherency... and locking"

On Fri, 21 Jul 2000, Scott Long wrote:

> I think the kernel people need to remember one very important thing: you
> are no longer working for yourselves, as a hobby. Your ideals about what

Wrong.

> So don't try to convince me that *I* am wrong by giving me technical
> spew. It won't work. And it won't work for the many other users out

The point is to be technically correct.

> And so in conclusion, I, a "mere user," want this safeguard in the
> kernel. If it's not there, I won't use the system. Period. BeOS is nice
> too. A simple API, good threading, good SMP. Just what I need.

Cya.

Stephen

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

- Next message: Johannes Erdfelt: "Re: TO HELL WITH IT THEN......(re: disk-destroyer.c)"
- Previous message: Linda Walsh: "RE: Cache coherency... and locking"