> I think the problem is a bit bigger than this. This problem in a nut
> shell is that cc compiles the inline code when it sees it, not when it
> is referenced. This means inline functions should _NOT_ be in header
> files _PERIOD_. Of the two possible fixes, I vote for fixing cc, but I
> am not holding my breath.
The common solution is to make the function a macro in that case. Aside
of that I consider gcc's implementation right. The inline should be
considered nothing but a hint to the compiler.
Ralf
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/