Re: IF only........g

Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Sat, 22 Jul 2000 14:28:11 +0100 (BST)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Khimenko Victor: "Re: TO HELL WITH IT THEN......(re: disk-destroyer.c)"
Previous message: Henning P. Schmiedehausen: "Re: The big IDE fight in a different light"

> STANDBY/SLEEP/STANDBY/SLEEP which would almost definitely overheat the
> drive ...). This disables all raw commands to IDE drives if CAP_RAWIO
> isn't present.

That is the correct intent of CAP_SYS_RAWIO. This IMHO is the right solution.
On a box with no rawio you cannot do /dev/mem or port stuff either

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Khimenko Victor: "Re: TO HELL WITH IT THEN......(re: disk-destroyer.c)"
Previous message: Henning P. Schmiedehausen: "Re: The big IDE fight in a different light"