Re: [CFT] dmfe.c network driver update for 2.4

[Jeff Garzik]

Tobias Ringstrom wrote:
> 
> On Fri, 17 Nov 2000, Frank Davis wrote:
> >
> >       I would rather fix those non-SMP compliant drivers to be SMP compliant,
> > then keeping them 'broken'. Adding the print statements would only be a
> > temporary solution.
> 
> Of course. This list of priorites is very natural, I think:
> 
> 1. Working SMP driver
> 2. Broken SMP driver with a warning.
> 3. Broken SMP driver without a warning. (Even if "everyone" knows it
>    is broken)
> 
> It takes less than a minute to add such a warning, but it can take days
> or weeks to find someone to really fix the driver. That was my point.

Marking them with a #warning is fine with me.

-- 
Jeff Garzik             |
Building 1024           | The chief enemy of creativity is "good" sense
MandrakeSoft            |          -- Picasso