Re: include conventions /usr/include/linux/sys ?

H. Peter Anvin (hpa@zytor.com)
22 Nov 2000 14:35:43 -0800

Followup to: <NBBBJGOOMDFADJDGDCPHOEKLCJAA.law@sgi.com>
By author: "LA Walsh" <law@sgi.com>
In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
>
> Linus has mentioned a desire to move kernel internal interfaces into
> a separate kernel include directory. In creating some code, I'm wondering
> what the name of this should/will be. Does it follow that convention
> would point toward a linux/sys directory?
>

I suggested include/kernel and include/arch with include/linux and
include/asm being reserved for the kernel interfaces (ioctl and their
structures mostly.)

-hpa

-- 
<hpa@transmeta.com> at work, <hpa@zytor.com> in private!
"Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot."
http://www.zytor.com/~hpa/puzzle.txt
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/