Linux-kernel mailing list archive 2000-47,: Re: silly [< >] and other excess

# Re: silly [< >] and other excess

Russell King (rmk@arm.linux.org.uk)
Thu, 23 Nov 2000 00:26:30 +0000 (GMT)

- Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
- Next message: Andi Kleen: "Re: [PATCH] Speed up interrupt entry"
- Previous message: David Schwartz: "RE: uname"
- In reply to: Albert D. Cahalan: "Re: silly [< >] and other excess"
- Next in thread: Ragnar Hojland Espinosa: "Re: silly [< >] and other excess"
- Next in thread: Keith Owens: "Re: silly [< >] and other excess"
- Reply: Ragnar Hojland Espinosa: "Re: silly [< >] and other excess"

Albert D. Cahalan writes:
> > Function entered at [<c2800060>] from [<c0026194>]
> > Function entered at [<c0025ac0>] from [<c0016860>]
> > Code: e51f2024 e5923000 (e5813000) e3a00000 e51f3030
>
> All those numbers get looked up. Keep going for another 25 lines too.

Oh, missed this one. Here you're wrong again. The numbers in [< >]
should be looked up, and no others. The code can look exactly like
a kernel address. In this case you definitely do NOT want to have
them converted.
_____
|_____| ------------------------------------------------- ---+---+-
| | Russell King rmk@arm.linux.org.uk --- ---
| | | | http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/personal/aboutme.html / / |
| +-+-+ --- -+-
/ | THE developer of ARM Linux |+| /|\
/ | | | --- |
+-+-+ ------------------------------------------------- /\\\ |
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

- Next message: Andi Kleen: "Re: [PATCH] Speed up interrupt entry"
- Previous message: David Schwartz: "RE: uname"
- In reply to: Albert D. Cahalan: "Re: silly [< >] and other excess"
- Next in thread: Ragnar Hojland Espinosa: "Re: silly [< >] and other excess"
- Next in thread: Keith Owens: "Re: silly [< >] and other excess"
- Reply: Ragnar Hojland Espinosa: "Re: silly [< >] and other excess"