Re: gcc-2.95.2-51 is buggy

Rik van Riel (riel@conectiva.com.br)
Sat, 25 Nov 2000 15:26:15 -0200 (BRDT)

On Fri, 24 Nov 2000, Neil Brown wrote:
> On Friday November 24, Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl wrote:
> > >> ... RedHat's GCC snapshot "2.96" handles this case just fine.
> >
> > > Now, if you can isolate the relevant part of the diff between
> > > 2.95.2 and RH 2.96...
> >
> > Maybe I have to be more precise in the statement "gcc 2.95.2 is buggy".

[image from FTP site not buggy]

> > This is from a SuSE distribution, I forget which, not very recent.
> > Revised summary: gcc-2.95.2-51 from SuSE is buggy.
>
> Ditto for gcc-2.95.2-13 from Debian (potato). It exhibits the
> same bug. Debian applies a total of 49 patches to gcc and the
> libraries.

The gcc-2.95.2-6cl from Conectiva 6.0 is buggy too.

(and the ISO images haven't even been available for
one week yet ... *sigh*)

regards,

Rik

--
Hollywood goes for world dumbination,
	Trailer at 11.


http://www.conectiva.com/		http://www.surriel.com/




-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/