Finland votes "YES" for the progression of DIS14771 ODP Naming framework
with the following comments:

1. Clause 7.2 -- editorial/technical

   The section should include description of the possible outcomes of
   the name resolution process: success (found, not found), failure
   (could not resolve for some reason), unknown (technically successful
   but the result is not available because of name binding inconsistency
   or because of access restrictions). The same aspect is clearly stated
   in clause 9 for name comparison.

2. Clause 9 -- technical 

   The termination choice of "indeterminant" in the name comparison
   process should be split to two distinctive alternatives: one, that
   implicates that it is worth trying again (technical failure), and
   another that implicates that the retry is worthless (semantic failure
   or access denial). This distinction would be very useful for the
   realisations of federated, fault tolerant mechanisms.