University homepage Suomenkielinen versio puuttuu Inte på svenska In english
University of Helsinki Department of Computer Science
 

Department of Computer Science

582442 Web Services Architecture (3 cr) - Report

ALERT - 25th May 2004 : This course is completed and the course results should be updated soon in the OODI system

ALERT - 7 June 2004: All material uploaded for reports and review

Student Name

Report Topic

Here are the Reviews to your Topic

Alejandro Fernandez Rey

UDDI2.0 Report

Review 1 Review 2

Baiquan Fan

Web Services User Interactions (WSRP) Report

Review 1 Review 2

Carlos Arrastia Aparicio

UDDI2.0 Report

Review 1 Review 2

Fairoos Salman

WS-Security 1. Cover 2-Report

Review 1 Review 2

Haajanen Jyrki Olavi

CAF/WS Transaction Management Report

No Reviews

Janne Savukoski

WS Notification Report

Review 1

Laukkanen Mikko

WSCI Report

Review 1 Review 2

Lehtinen Tero Tapio

WS Trust Report

Review 1 Review 2Review 3

Lili Zhang

WS Reliability Report

Review 1 Review 2 Review 3

Sampo Karjalainen

BPMLReport

Review 1 Review 2Review 3

Taina Hatakka

WS Transaction Reports

Review 1 Review 2

Muräncsik György

WS Transaction Report

Review 1 Review 2

Jorge Delfin Neri

WS Security Report

Review 1 Review 2Review 3

 

ALERT - 08 March 2004 : The reviews to your reports are uploaded now on this page, you do not need to do any further action than to read the reviews and if interested exchange messages with the reviewer, keep me in the CC, Some of you have already done that


Back to Course Page

- Study reports (report deadline: 12th(16th final) Feb/ Review deadline:23rd(27th final))

  • What is required to be done ?
    1. A 10 page report which will be an effort of 20-25hours deadline 12th February / Hard deadline:16th February In the report Discuss defending and offending the potential strengths and pitfalls of specific Web Services technology and concepts behind them
    2. Some hints on what you can write about them, it is upto to you on the structure of the report
      • Overview of the specifications - 40%
      • Analysis of the specifications - 20%
      • Maturity of the specification based on reports you can find around this specification, if there are competing specifications around this topic. - 20%
      • Your conclusions of the specifications - 10%
      • Future directions of this specifications (application areas, standards, etc)- 10%
    3. 2 Review reports each of 1-2 pages long, which should be an effort of 8-10 hours -deadline 23rd February / Hard deadline: 27th March
    NOTE: Will update here what to do after you have completed your report and review..

-List of report Topics

Back to Course Page


Suresh Chande

Department homepage | Faculty homepage | University homepage
Department contact information | Feedback to the department | Style settings