Review Instructions
===================

Let's have a simple role play: You are asked to act as one of the
reviewer in a workshop. Our seminar will play to role of the workshop.

You have been assigned a number of papers to review. In our case, you
will have two papers to review. You need to submit your review in
electronic form to the conference organiser (role played by Jussi).


The review form (public part) has the following questions, you need to answer

Paper Information:

Author, title

Overview: Write a couple of sentences about what you see are the key
points in the paper, what the paper speaks about.

Evaluation part:
- Intelligibility
- Technical quality
- Presentation quality
- Overall grade

Please evaluate those four items using the scale 1 to 5. 1 poor, 3
medium, 5 high.

Intelligibility: Evaluate things like how easy it was to understand,
was the presentation in a good level, not too simple, not too
difficult.

Technical quality: References ok, figures have titles, etc. technical
features of the paper

Presentation quality: Language issues here.

Overall quality: What grade would you give to the paper in overall


Detailed comments (private part):

Please create also a lot of detailed comments about the reviewed
papers. You can write these either in a separate file or just write
them by hand on the paper itself.

You could look at the structure: Is there any connection between
sections? Are the different parts totally different?

Mark also language issues, unclear parts, make suggestions for
improvements etc.  These can be listed also directly to the article.

This detailed commenting help you to improve your own proof-reading
skills. These skills will be useful when editing your own texts also.


So the email to Jussi should have
Author:
Title: 
Overview:
Intelligibility: 
Technical quality:
Presentation quality:
Overall grade:

These will be also delivered to the author.

The commented papers can be given directly to the author at the meeting.