Journal and Conference Papers
|
Janne Lindqvist, Essi Vehmersalo, Miika Komu and Jukka Manner Enterprise Network Packet Filtering for Mobile Cryptographic Identities Usenix 2007 Annual Technical Conference, Santa Clara, CA, June 20, 2007. |
|
Kristiina Karvonen, Pauli Vesterinen, Jukka Manner Easy-to-Use Firewall Management for Home Users Symposium On Usable Privacy and Security (SOUPS) 2007, Workshop on Usable IT Security Management (USM'07) (to appear). |
|
Jukka Manner, Antti Ylä-Jääski, Juhamatti Kettunen Efficient Distributed Service Location and Session Management for Ad-hoc Networks IEEE WOWMON, 2007 (to appear). |
|
Simone Leggio, Jukka Manner, Kimmo Raatikainen A Secure SIP-based Instant Messaging and Presence Framework for Ad-Hoc Networks 49th IEEE GLOBECOM, San Francisco, November 27 - December 1, 2006. |
|
Harri Paloheimo, Jukka Manner, Johanna Nieminen, Antti Ylä-Jääski Challenges in Packet Scheduling in 4G Wireless Networks 17th IEEE Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications, Helsinki, Finland, August, 2006. |
|
Jukka Manner, Simone Leggio, Kimmo Raatikainen An Internet SIP Gateway for Ad-hoc Networks IEEE Sensor and Ad Hoc Communications and Networks (SECON), 2006, Volume 3, pp. 740 - 745. |
|
Janne Lindqvist, Antti Ylä-Jääski, Jukka Manner Resilient IPv6 Multicast Address Allocation in Ad Hoc Networks IEEE Sensor and Ad Hoc Communications and Networks (SECON), 2006, Volume 3, pp. 786 - 791. |
|
Linda Källström, Simone Leggio, Sanna Suoranta, Jukka Manner, Tommi Mikkonen, Kimmo Raatikainen, Jussi Saarinen, Antti Ylä-Jääski A Framework for Seamless Service Interworking in Ad-Hoc Networks Elsevier Computer Communications, Volume 29, Issue 16, 12 October 2006, Pages 3277-3294. |
|
Xiaoming Fu, Jukka Manner RSVP Standards Today and the Path Towards a Generic Messenger 13th International Workshop on Quality of Service (IWQoS 2005), June 21-23, 2005, University of Passau, Germany. |
|
Jukka Manner, Xiaoming Fu Analysis of Existing Quality-of-Service Signaling Protocols Internet Engineering Task Force, Request for Comments (RFC) 4094, May 2005. |
![]() |
|
Simone Leggio, Sanna Liimatainen, Jukka Manner, Tommi Mikkonen, Jussi
Saarinen, Antti Ylä-Jääski Towards Service Interworking among Ad-Hoc Networks and the Internet 14th IST Mobile and Wireless Communications Summit, Dresden, 19-23 June, 2005. |
|
Simone Leggio, Jukka Manner, Kimmo Raatikainen Achieving Seamless Mobility in IP-based Radio Access Networks IEEE Wireless Communications Magazine, Vol. 12 (1), February, 2005. |
|
Jukka Manner, Tapio Suihko, Kimmo Raatikainen Unified Local Mobility Management Workshop on Challenges of Mobility 2004, Organised in the scope of IFIP WCC 2004 Toulouse, France August 27, 2004. |
![]() |
|
Jukka Manner, Markku Kojo Mobility Related Terminology Internet Engineering Task Force, Request for Comments (RFC) 3753, June 2004. |
![]() |
|
James Kempf (editor) Problem Description: Reasons For Doing Context Transfers Between Nodes in an IP Access Network. Internet Engineering Task Force, Request for Comments (RFC) 3374, September 2002. |
![]() |
|
Louise Burness, Eleanor Hepworth, Alberto López, Jukka Manner Architecture for Providing QoS in an IP-based Mobile Network IST Mobile Summit 2001, 9 - 12 September, Barcelona, Spain. |
![]() |
|
Jukka Manner, Kimmo Raatikainen Extended Quality-of-Service for Mobile Networks IEEE/IFIP Ninth International Workshop on Quality of Service (IWQoS 2001) Karlsruhe, Germany, June 6 - 8, 2001. Published in the Springer LNCS Series, Vol. 2092, pp. 275-280. (© Springer-Verlag) |
![]() ![]() |
Ph.D. Thesis
Jukka MannerProvision of Quality of Service in IP-based Mobile Access Networks
Ph.D. Thesis, University of Helsinki, Deparment of Computer Science,
November 2003, Report number A-2003-8.
The thesis is available from the E-thesis service at the University of Helsinki.
Supervisor: Professor Kimmo Raatikainen
Licenthiate Thesis
Jukka MannerAn IP-based Mobile and QoS-aware Network Architecture
Ph.Lic. Thesis, University of Helsinki, Deparment of Computer Science,
April 2002, Report number C-2002-12.
Master's Thesis
Jukka Manner
TCP over GPRS - Performance Analysis
MSc. Thesis, University of Helsinki, Deparment of Computer Science,
December 1999, Report number C-1999-72.
IETF Request for Comments (RFC)
James Kempf (editor)Problem Description:
Reasons For Doing Context Transfers Between Nodes in an IP Access Network.
Internet Engineering Task Force, Request for Comments (RFC) 3374, September 2002.
Jukka Manner, Markku Kojo
Mobility Related Terminology
Internet Engineering Task Force, Request for Comments (RFC) 3753, June 2004.
Jukka Manner, Xiaoming Fu
Analysis of Existing Quality-of-Service Signaling Protocols
Internet Engineering Task Force, Request for Comments (RFC) 4094, May 2005.
Active Working Group Internet Drafts
S. Lee, S. jeong, H. Tschofening, X. Fu, J. MannerApplicability Statement of NSIS Protocols in Mobile Environments
Internet Draft (work in progress), October, 2005.
Mobility of an IP-based node affects routing paths, and as a result, can have a dramatic effect on protocol operation and state management. This draft discusses the effects mobility can cause to the NSIS protocols, and how the protocols operate in different scenarios, and together with mobility management protocols.
J. Manner, G. Karagiannis, A. McDonald, S. Van den Bosh
NSLP for Quality-of-Service signalling
This draft describes an NSIS Signalling Layer Protocol (NSLP) for signalling QoS reservations in the Internet. It is in accordance with the framework and requirements developed in NSIS. Together with GIST, it provides functionality similar to RSVP and extends it. The QoS NSLP is independent of the underlying QoS specification or architecture and provides support for different reservation models. It is simplified by the elimination of support for multicast flows. This draft explains the overall protocol approach, design decisions made and provides examples. It specifies object and message formats and processing rules.
Active Personal Internet Drafts
Francois Le faucheur, Jukka Manner, Dan WingRSVP Proxy Approaches
Internet Draft, October, 2006.
This draft specifies a mechanism for explicit control of RSVP proxies. The scheme is based on one bit and two new RSVP messages, and allows triggering both RSVP Sender and Receiver proxies.
Jukka Manner
Localized RSVP for Controlling RSVP Proxies
Internet Draft, October, 2006.
This draft specifies a mechanism for explicit control of RSVP proxies. The scheme is based on one bit and two new RSVP messages, and allows triggering both RSVP Sender and Receiver proxies.
Jukka Manner, Tapio Suihko, Markku Kojo, Mika Liljeberg, Kimmo Raatikainen
Localized RSVP
Internet Draft, February, 2006.
Guaranteed QoS for multimedia applications is based on reserved resources in each node on the end-to-end path. Even if the correspondent node does not support QoS, it would be useful to be able to reserve at least local resources at the access network, especially wireless link resources. Additionally, for mobile nodes the continuity of QoS is disturbed due to end-to-end signaling or slow re-reservations of resources after each handover. This draft proposes a simple enhancement to RSVP, so that initial resource reservations and re-reservations due to host mobility can be done locally in an access network.
Jukka Manner, Martin Stiemerling, Hannes Tschofenig
Authorization for NSIS Signaling Layer Protocols
Internet Draft, October, 2006.
Guaranteed QoS for multimedia applications is based on reserved resources in each node on the end-to-end path. Even if the correspondent node does not support QoS, it would be useful to be able to reserve at least local resources at the access network, e.g., wireless link resources. Additionally, for mobile nodes the continuity of QoS is disturbed due to end-to-end signaling or slow re-reservations of resources after each handover. This draft proposes a simple enhancement to RSVP, so that initial resource reservations and re-reservations, e.g., due to host mobility can be done locally in an access network.
Expired and other personal Internet Drafts
This is may not be up to date anymore... too much happens. I'll update this list from time to time...maybe...:)
D. Partain (ed.), A. Bergstein, M. Greis, G. Karagiannis, J. Manner, J.Murphy, P. Pan, V. Rexhepi, L. Westberg, H. Zheng
NSIS QoS Signalling Requirements
Internet Draft (work in progress), February 2002.
(draft-partain-nsis-requirements-00.txt).
This memo identifies a set of requirements that must be applied to the development of the NSIS quality of service (QoS) signalling protocol. These requirements are based upon the needs of various kinds of applications that will utilize IP networks and need to be able to signal their QoS needs.
Issues raised in this draft are included in the NSIS WG requirements draft.
Marc Greis, Haihong Zheng, Jukka Manner
Requirements for QoS Signaling
Internet Draft (work in progress), November 19, 2001.
(draft-greis-qos-signaling-requirements-00.txt)
This draft proposes a set of requirements for QoS signaling protocols. These requirements are derived both from past experience with existing QoS signaling protocols as well as new challenges which arise for QoS signaling e.g. from mobile, wireless and cellular networks.
Issues raised in this draft are included in the NSIS WG requirements draft.
Jukka Manner, Markku Kojo, Charles Perkins, Tapio Suihko, Phil Eardley,
Dave Wisely, Robert Hancock, Nikos Georganopoulos
Mobility Related Terminology
Internet Draft (work in progress), May 31, 2001.
(draft-manner-seamoby-terms-04.txt)
There is a need for common definitions of terminology in the work to be done around IP mobility. This memo defines terms for mobility related terminology. It is intended as a living document for use by the Seamoby working group, and especially for use in Seamoby drafts and in WG discussions.Other working groups dealing with mobility may also take advantage of this terminology.
This I-D was taken as a Seamoby WG draft.
Jukka Manner, Markku Kojo (editors)
Mobility Related Terminology
Internet Draft (work in progress), February, 2004.
This draft is now RFC3753.
Levkowetz, O. H., et al., Problem Description:
Reasons For Doing Context Transfers Between Nodes in an IP Access Network.
Internet Draft (work in progress), June 2001 (expires December 2001).
(draft-ietf-seamoby-context-transfer-problem-stat-02.txt).
There are a large number of IP access networks that support mobility of hosts. For example, wireless Personal Area Networks (PANs) and LANs, satellite and cellular WANs. The nature of this mobility is such that the communication path to the host changes frequently, and rapidly.
This Internet-Draft aims at expressing the problems occurring during such mobility which require the exchange of IP flow context between different nodes in the access network. A reference architecture is described and the central terms "Context" and "Context Transfer" defined. Some explicit problems which benefits from context transfer are listed.
This draft is now RFC3374.
Jukka Manner, Tapio Suihko, Markku Kojo, Mika Liljeberg, Kimmo Raatikainen
Localized RSVP
Internet Draft, September, 2004.
Guaranteed QoS for multimedia applications is based on reserved resources in each node on the end-to-end path. Even if the correspondent node does not support QoS, it would be useful to be able to reserve at least local resources at the access network, especially wireless link resources. Additionally, for mobile nodes the continuity of QoS is disturbed due to end-to-end signaling or slow re-reservations of resources after each handover. This draft proposes a simple enhancement to RSVP, so that initial resource reservations and re-reservations due to host mobility can be done locally in an access network.
Jukka Manner, Xiaoming Fu
Analysis of Existing QoS Signalling Protocols
Internet Engineering Task Force, Next Steps in Signalling (NSIS) Working Group,
December, 2004.
This document reviews some of the existing QoS signaling protocols for an IP network. The goal here is to learn from them and to avoid common misconceptions. Further, we need to avoid the mistakes during the design and the implementation of any new protocol in this area.
Robert Hancock, Jukka Manner, Charles Q. Shen
Interactions of Routing and Mobility on NTLP and NSLP
Internet Draft (work in progress), October, 2003.
IP packet routing and changes in routes can have major influence on protocols and services that set state in network nodes. Routing may change, for example, due to node failure within the network, need for load balancing, multihoming or due to end-host or even network mobility. This draft is a first step in helping us to decide on how these problems should be handled and how interactions with other protocols should be handled and a stimulus to further security work.
Issues in this draft were taken into the NSIS Mobility Applicability draft
S. Lee, S. jeong, H. Tschofening, X. Fu, J. Manner
Applicability Statement of NSIS Protocols in Mobile Environments
Internet Draft (work in progress), July, 2004.
Mobility of an IP-based node affects routing paths, and as a result, can have a dramatic effect on protocol operation and state management. This draft discusses the effects mobility can cause to the NSIS protocols, and how the protocols operate in different scenarios, and together with mobility management protocols.
This draft become an NSIS WG item.
Last modified Wednesday August 15, 2007




