BTW, "rmdir `pwd`" is not portable either.
> portable way to achieve the same result. In your situation such way indeed
> exists and is prefectly doable in userland. If you want a cute DoWhatIMean
> wrapper around rmdir(2) - fine, you've just written one of the variants.
As just said I'm really not concerned about my code.
> Any reasons to keep that in the kernel? None? Thank you, case closed.
I think it would provide nicer semantics as 2.2.x does. The performance
argument seems irrelevant to me.
Andrea
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/