Re: khttpd beaten by boa

[David S. Miller]

Lars Marowsky-Bree writes:
 > This just goes on to show that khttpd is unnecessary kernel bloat
 > and can be "just as well" handled by a userspace application, minus
 > some rather very special cases which do not justify its inclusion
 > into the main kernel.

My take on this is that khttpd is unmaintained garbage.

TUX is evidence that khttpd can be done properly and
beat the pants off of anything done in userspace.

Later,
David S. Miller
[e-mail]