> Of course, you may be right on wuftpd. It obviously wasn't designed with
> security in mind, other alternatives may be better.
I run proftpd on all my ftp servers - it's fast, configurable
and can do all the tricks I need - even red hat seems to
agree that proftpd is the way to go.
Visit any red hat ftp site and they are running proftpd -
So, why do they keep shipping us wu-ftpd instead?
That really frosts me.
jjs
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/