Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]]

Ingo Molnar (mingo@elte.hu)
Thu, 18 Jan 2001 22:57:20 +0100 (CET)


On Thu, 18 Jan 2001, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:

> > {
> > int val = 1;
> > setsockopt(req->sock, IPPROTO_TCP, TCP_CORK,
> > (char *)&val,sizeof(val));
> > val = 0;
> > setsockopt(req->sock, IPPROTO_TCP, TCP_CORK,
> > (char *)&val,sizeof(val));
> > }
> >
> > differ from what you posted. It does the same in my opinion. Maybe we are
> > not talking about the same thing?
>
> The above is equivalent to SIOCPUSH _only_ if the caller wasn't using either
> TCP_NODELAY or TCP_CORK.

why? I can restore whatever state i want, the above is just a mechanizm to
force the push.

Ingo

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/