Re: VIA chipset discussion

David D.W. Downey (pgpkeys@hislinuxbox.com)
Sun, 21 Jan 2001 10:46:10 -0800 (PST)


I get something similar. *I* get it when I mix drives on the various
controllers, aka ATA33/66 and ATA100 drives. I also get this error from
the CDROM when using the ATA100 controller for my ATA100 30GB drive and
the ATA33/66 controller for the CDROM. (Cyber 48X generic IDE CDROM).

On Sat, 20 Jan 2001, Andy Galasso wrote:

> I'm not sure how relevant it is, but FWIW here's what I've got:
>
> MSI 694D Pro Motherboard 2xPIII-800 100MHz FSB
> Linux-2.4.0-prerelease SMP
> Promise FastTrak100 controller card
> 4 IBM DTLA-307030 drives attached to Promise card
> boot params: ide2=0xac00 ide3=0xb400
>
> Here's an excerpt of what I get when trying to boot:
>
> VP_IDE: IDE controller on PCI bus 00 dev 39
> VP_IDE: chipset revision 16
> VP_IDE: not 100% native mode: will probe irqs later
> VP_IDE: VIA vt82c686a IDE UDMA66 controller on pci0:7.1
> ide0: BM-DMA at 0x9000-0x9007, BIOS settings: hda:pio, hdb:pio
> ide1: BM-DMA at 0x9008-0x900f, BIOS settings: hdc:DMA, hdd:pio
> PDC20267: IDE controller on PCI bus 00 dev 70
> PDC20267: chipset revision 2
> PDC20267: not 100% native mode: will probe irqs later
> PDC20267: (U)DMA Burst Bit ENABLED Primary MASTER Mode Secondary MASTER Mode.
> PDC20267: neither IDE port enabled (BIOS)
> hde: probing with STATUS(0x50) instead of ALTSTATUS(0xff)
> hde: IBM-DTLA-307030, ATA DISK drive
> hdf: probing with STATUS(0x50) instead of ALTSTATUS(0xff)
> hdf: IBM-DTLA-307030, ATA DISK drive
> hdg: probing with STATUS(0x50) instead of ALTSTATUS(0xff)
> hdg: IBM-DTLA-307030, ATA DISK drive
> hdh: probing with STATUS(0x50) instead of ALTSTATUS(0xff)
> hdh: IBM-DTLA-307030, ATA DISK drive
> ide1 at 0x170-0x177,0x376 on irq 15
> ide2 at 0xac00-0xac07,0xae06 on irq 16
> ide3 at 0xb400-0xb407,0xb606 on irq 16 (shared with ide2)
> hde: 60036480 sectors (30739 MB) w/1916KiB Cache, CHS=59560/16/63
> hdf: 60036480 sectors (30739 MB) w/1916KiB Cache, CHS=59560/16/63
> hdg: 60036480 sectors (30739 MB) w/1916KiB Cache, CHS=59560/16/63
> hdh: 60036480 sectors (30739 MB) w/1916KiB Cache, CHS=59560/16/63
> Partition check:
> hde:hde: irq timeout: status=0x50 { DriveReady SeekComplete }
> hde: irq timeout: status=0x50 { DriveReady SeekComplete }
> hde: irq timeout: status=0x50 { DriveReady SeekComplete }
> hde: irq timeout: status=0x50 { DriveReady SeekComplete }
> ide2: reset: master: error (0x00?)
> hde: irq timeout: status=0x50 { DriveReady SeekComplete }
> hde: irq timeout: status=0x50 { DriveReady SeekComplete }
> hde: irq timeout: status=0x50 { DriveReady SeekComplete }
> hde: irq timeout: status=0x58 { DriveReady SeekComplete DataRequest }
> ide2(?): unexpected interrupt, status=0x58, count=1
> ide2: reset: master: error (0x00?)
> hde: status error: status=0x58 { DriveReady SeekComplete DataRequest }
> end_request: I/O error, dev 21:00 (hde), sector 0
> hde: drive not ready for command
> unable to read partition table
> hdf:hdf: irq timeout: status=0x50 { DriveReady SeekComplete }
> hdf: irq timeout: status=0x50 { DriveReady SeekComplete }
> hdf: irq timeout: status=0x50 { DriveReady SeekComplete }
> hdf: irq timeout: status=0x58 { DriveReady SeekComplete DataRequest }
> ide2(?): unexpected interrupt, status=0x58, count=2
> ide2: reset: master: error (0x00?)
> hdf: status error: status=0x58 { DriveReady SeekComplete DataRequest }
> hdf: drive not ready for command
> hdf: irq timeout: status=0x50 { DriveReady SeekComplete }
> hdf: irq timeout: status=0x50 { DriveReady SeekComplete }
> hdf: irq timeout: status=0x58 { DriveReady SeekComplete DataRequest }
> ide2(?): unexpected interrupt, status=0x58, count=3
> ide2: reset: master: error (0x00?)
> hdf: status error: status=0x58 { DriveReady SeekComplete DataRequest }
> end_request: I/O error, dev 21:40 (hdf), sector 0
> hdf: drive not ready for command
> unable to read partition table
> ...
> (similar for hdg ... hdh ...)
> ...
>
> -Andy Galasso
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 17, 2001 at 02:02:17PM -0800, David D.W. Downey wrote:
> >
> > Could those that were involved in the VIA chipset discussion email me
> > privately at pgpkeys@hislinuxbox.com?
> >
> > I'm truly interested in solving this issue. I personally think it's more
> > than just the chipset causing the problems.
> >
> >
> > I'm looking for members of the list that are using the kernel support for
> > the following
> >
> >
> > VIA chipset
> > Promise controller (PDC2026# with specifics on the PDC20265 (ATA100))
> > SMP support
> > IDE + SCSI mix in the system.
> >
> >
> > I'm trying to track a number of POSSIBLE bugs (can't say they are for
> > sure) and any input from folks with this mix of drivers would be
> > exponentially useful, even if for nothing more than discounting some of my
> > thoughts.
> >
> >
> > Also, can anyone summurize the already known and specific problems with
> > combinations of the above requirements? I would truly appreciate that.
> >
> > David D.W. Downey
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/