Re: Proper OOPS report

Henrik Stokseth (hstokset@privat.cybercity.no)
Mon, 22 Jan 2001 15:39:35 +0100

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Plinio Barraza: "Replicating Current Kernell"
Previous message: Barry K. Nathan: "Re: Is this kernel related (signal 11)?"
Maybe in reply to: Tom: "Proper OOPS report"
Next in thread: Tom: "Re: Proper OOPS report"

you were the one with the gcc 2.95.3 compiler right? even though this
compiler is a prerelease of a stable branch i have confirmed errors in the
optimalization passes. my advice: use a compiler which really IS stable
(gcc-2.95.2 or egcs-1.1.2 are fine), or turn off all optimalizations.

-henrik

----- Original Message -----
From: Tom <freyason@yahoo.com>
To: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Sent: Monday, January 22, 2001 2:11 PM
Subject: Proper OOPS report

> My apologies for not running it through ksymoops.
> No specific bit of code was referenced in the OOPS so I am assuming
> it is in the kernel itself.
<snip>

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Plinio Barraza: "Replicating Current Kernell"
Previous message: Barry K. Nathan: "Re: Is this kernel related (signal 11)?"
Maybe in reply to: Tom: "Proper OOPS report"
Next in thread: Tom: "Re: Proper OOPS report"