Re: [linux-audio-dev] low-latency scheduling patch for 2.4.0

Pavel Machek (pavel@suse.cz)
Fri, 26 Jan 2001 10:14:22 +0100


Hi!

> > And making the kernel preemptive might be the best way to do that
> > (and I'm saying "might"...).
>
> Keep in mind that Ken Thompson & Dennis Ritchie did not decide on a
> non-preemptive strategy for UNIX because they were unaware of such
> methods or because they were stupid. And when Rob Pike redesigned a new
> "unix" Plan9 note there is no-preemptive kernel, and the core Linux
> designers have rejected preemptive kernels too. Now it is certainly possible
> that things have change and/or all these folks are just plain wrong. But
> I wouldn't bet too much on it.

Wrong. It was linus who suggested how to do preemptive kernel nicely. I
guess he counts as core Linux designer ;-).
Pavel

-- 
I'm pavel@ucw.cz. "In my country we have almost anarchy and I don't care."
Panos Katsaloulis describing me w.r.t. patents at discuss@linmodems.org
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/