[PATCH] getting rid of tqueue_lock

Manfred (manfred@colorfullife.com)
Mon, 29 Jan 2001 16:36:10 +0100


This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------67E602F21A95EF7945D44498
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

I noticed that the tasks queues still rely on the global tqueue_lock
spinlock, instead of a per-taskqueue lock.

The patch is virtually transparent for task queue users: all users
except ieee1394 use DECLARE_TASK_QUEUE.

I admit that the tqueue_lock isn't that often used (numbers from sgi's
lockstat)

* 10000 users/min during 'find / -xdev -uid 4711' (1.2% of all spinlock
calls)
* 60000 users/min during 'dd if=/dev/hda of=/dev/null' (~1.1% of all
spinlock calls).

--
	Manfred
--------------67E602F21A95EF7945D44498
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii;
 name="patch-tqueue"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline;
 filename="patch-tqueue"

// $Header$ // Kernel Version: // VERSION = 2 // PATCHLEVEL = 4 // SUBLEVEL = 1 // EXTRAVERSION =-pre11 --- 2.4/drivers/char/n_r3964.c Mon Dec 11 21:57:28 2000 +++ build-2.4/drivers/char/n_r3964.c Mon Jan 29 14:54:29 2001 @@ -1185,13 +1185,15 @@ /* * Make sure that our task queue isn't activated. If it * is, take it out of the linked list. + * FIXME: buggy, another cpu might be in the middle of + * __run_task_queue(). */ - spin_lock_irqsave(&tqueue_lock, flags); + spin_lock_irqsave(&tq_timer.lock, flags); if (pInfo->bh_1.sync) list_del(&pInfo->bh_1.list); if (pInfo->bh_2.sync) list_del(&pInfo->bh_2.list); - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&tqueue_lock, flags); + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&tq_timer.lock, flags); /* Remove client-structs and message queues: */ pClient=pInfo->firstClient; --- 2.4/include/linux/tqueue.h Thu Jan 4 23:50:46 2001 +++ build-2.4/include/linux/tqueue.h Mon Jan 29 14:54:29 2001 @@ -42,10 +42,21 @@ void *data; /* argument to function */ }; -typedef struct list_head task_queue; +typedef struct { + struct list_head list; + spinlock_t lock; +} task_queue; -#define DECLARE_TASK_QUEUE(q) LIST_HEAD(q) -#define TQ_ACTIVE(q) (!list_empty(&q)) +#define TASK_QUEUE_INIT(name) { LIST_HEAD_INIT(name.list), SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED } + +#define INIT_TASK_QUEUE(ptr) do { \ + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&(ptr)->list); \ + spin_lock_init(&(ptr)->lock); \ +} while (0) + + +#define DECLARE_TASK_QUEUE(q) task_queue q = TASK_QUEUE_INIT(q) +#define TQ_ACTIVE(q) (!list_empty(&(q).list)) extern task_queue tq_timer, tq_immediate, tq_disk; @@ -72,20 +83,18 @@ * interrupt. */ -extern spinlock_t tqueue_lock; - /* * Queue a task on a tq. Return non-zero if it was successfully * added. */ -static inline int queue_task(struct tq_struct *bh_pointer, task_queue *bh_list) +static inline int queue_task(struct tq_struct *bh_pointer, task_queue *tq) { int ret = 0; if (!test_and_set_bit(0,&bh_pointer->sync)) { unsigned long flags; - spin_lock_irqsave(&tqueue_lock, flags); - list_add_tail(&bh_pointer->list, bh_list); - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&tqueue_lock, flags); + spin_lock_irqsave(&tq->lock, flags); + list_add_tail(&bh_pointer->list, &tq->list); + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&tq->lock, flags); ret = 1; } return ret; @@ -97,10 +106,10 @@ extern void __run_task_queue(task_queue *list); -static inline void run_task_queue(task_queue *list) +static inline void run_task_queue(task_queue *tq) { - if (TQ_ACTIVE(*list)) - __run_task_queue(list); + if (TQ_ACTIVE(*tq)) + __run_task_queue(tq); } #endif /* _LINUX_TQUEUE_H */ --- 2.4/kernel/timer.c Sun Dec 10 18:53:19 2000 +++ build-2.4/kernel/timer.c Mon Jan 29 14:54:29 2001 @@ -323,8 +323,6 @@ spin_unlock_irq(&timerlist_lock); } -spinlock_t tqueue_lock = SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED; - void tqueue_bh(void) { run_task_queue(&tq_timer); --- 2.4/kernel/ksyms.c Mon Jan 29 14:53:44 2001 +++ build-2.4/kernel/ksyms.c Mon Jan 29 14:54:29 2001 @@ -372,7 +372,6 @@ #ifdef CONFIG_SMP /* Various random spinlocks we want to export */ -EXPORT_SYMBOL(tqueue_lock); /* Big-Reader lock implementation */ EXPORT_SYMBOL(__brlock_array); --- 2.4/kernel/softirq.c Fri Dec 29 23:07:24 2000 +++ build-2.4/kernel/softirq.c Mon Jan 29 14:54:29 2001 @@ -289,15 +289,15 @@ open_softirq(HI_SOFTIRQ, tasklet_hi_action, NULL); } -void __run_task_queue(task_queue *list) +void __run_task_queue(task_queue *tq) { struct list_head head, *next; unsigned long flags; - spin_lock_irqsave(&tqueue_lock, flags); - list_add(&head, list); - list_del_init(list); - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&tqueue_lock, flags); + spin_lock_irqsave(&tq->lock, flags); + list_add(&head, &tq->list); + list_del_init(&tq->list); + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&tq->lock, flags); next = head.next; while (next != &head) { --- 2.4/drivers/ieee1394/ieee1394_core.c Mon Oct 2 04:53:07 2000 +++ build-2.4/drivers/ieee1394/ieee1394_core.c Mon Jan 29 14:54:29 2001 @@ -100,6 +100,7 @@ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&packet->list); sema_init(&packet->state_change, 0); + INIT_TASK_QUEUE(&packet->complete_tq); packet->state = unused; packet->generation = get_hpsb_generation(); packet->data_be = 1;

--------------67E602F21A95EF7945D44498--

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/