Re: Desk check of raid5.c patch from [e-mail]?

[Ingo Molnar]

On Mon, 29 Jan 2001, Quim K Holland wrote:

> I've been following the recent 2.4.1-pre series and am wondering why
> the following one-liner (obviously correct) patch has not been
> applied. [...]

> -               return_ok = bh->b_reqnext;
> +               return_fail = bh->b_reqnext;

oops - i do have it in my tree, somehow it escaped.

	Ingo