Re: modversions.h source pollution in 2.4

Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Mon, 5 Feb 2001 18:21:09 +0000 (GMT)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Jeff Garzik: "Re: 2.4.{1,2pre1} oops in via82cxxx_audio (?)"
Previous message: Andreas Dilger: "Re: modversions.h source pollution in 2.4"
In reply to: Andreas Dilger: "Re: modversions.h source pollution in 2.4"

> "#include <linux/modversions.h>" line is needed... Also, what kernel
> versions is this needed for? The LVM code uses a common source file
> for 2.2 and 2.4, so should the #include stay in for 2.2?

It shouldnt there for 2.2 either
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Jeff Garzik: "Re: 2.4.{1,2pre1} oops in via82cxxx_audio (?)"
Previous message: Andreas Dilger: "Re: modversions.h source pollution in 2.4"
In reply to: Andreas Dilger: "Re: modversions.h source pollution in 2.4"