Re: [PATCH] Small kernel-hacking.tmpl update

Ingo Oeser (ingo.oeser@informatik.tu-chemnitz.de)
Fri, 9 Feb 2001 04:25:57 +0100

On Thu, Feb 08, 2001 at 01:50:00PM +0000, John Levon wrote:
> + <para>
> + For more complicated module unload locking requirements, you can set the
> + <structfield>can_unload</structfield> function pointer to your own routine,
> + which should return <returnvalue>0</returnvalue> if the module is
> + unloadable, or <returnvalue>-EBUSY</returnvalue> otherwise.
s/is unloadable/cannot be removed/

This makes it more explicit. You could read "is unloadable" as
"is not loadable", if you are not that familiar with English.

Rest ist correct AFAICS.

Regards

Ingo Oeser

-- 
10.+11.03.2001 - 3. Chemnitzer LinuxTag <http://www.tu-chemnitz.de/linux/tag>
         <<<<<<<<<<<<       come and join the fun       >>>>>>>>>>>>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/