Re: [PATCH] More network pci_enable cleanups.

Jeff Garzik (jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com)
Sat, 10 Feb 2001 22:54:28 -0500


davej@suse.de wrote:
> diff -urN --exclude-from=/home/davej/.exclude linux/drivers/net/defxx.c linux-dj/drivers/net/defxx.c
> --- linux/drivers/net/defxx.c Sat Feb 10 02:49:43 2001
> +++ linux-dj/drivers/net/defxx.c Sat Feb 10 03:05:03 2001
> @@ -414,6 +415,7 @@
> struct net_device *dev;
> DFX_board_t *bp; /* board pointer */
> static int version_disp;
> + int err;
>
> if (!version_disp) /* display version info if adapter is found */
> {
> @@ -429,8 +431,8 @@
>
> /* Enable PCI device. */
> if (pdev != NULL) {
> - if (pci_enable_device (pdev))
> - goto err_out;
> + err = pci_enable_device (pdev);
> + if (err) return err;
> ioaddr = pci_resource_start (pdev, 1);
> }

1) Bug: Introduced memory leak by replacing "goto err_out" with "return
err"

2) Sole usage of 'err' -- it should be scoped inside the pdev!=NULL
check.

> diff -urN --exclude-from=/home/davej/.exclude linux/drivers/net/dgrs.c linux-dj/drivers/net/dgrs.c
> --- linux/drivers/net/dgrs.c Sat Feb 10 02:49:43 2001
> +++ linux-dj/drivers/net/dgrs.c Sat Feb 10 03:05:09 2001
> @@ -1352,7 +1355,7 @@
>
> static int __init dgrs_scan(void)
> {
> - int cards_found = 0;
> + int cards_found;
> uint io;
> uint mem;
> uint irq;

Rejected. Introduces bug. That zero is required!

> diff -urN --exclude-from=/home/davej/.exclude linux/drivers/net/eepro.c linux-dj/drivers/net/eepro.c
> --- linux/drivers/net/eepro.c Sat Feb 10 02:49:43 2001
> +++ linux-dj/drivers/net/eepro.c Sat Feb 10 03:05:05 2001
> @@ -1098,7 +1098,7 @@
> printk (KERN_ERR "%s: transmit timed out, %s?\n", dev->name,
> "network cable problem");
> /* This is not a duplicate. One message for the console,
> - one for the the log file */
> + one for the log file */
> printk (KERN_DEBUG "%s: transmit timed out, %s?\n", dev->name,
> "network cable problem");
> eepro_complete_selreset(ioaddr);

rejected -- already in AC patches (and merged into my tree as well)

> diff -urN --exclude-from=/home/davej/.exclude linux/drivers/net/eepro100.c linux-dj/drivers/net/eepro100.c
> --- linux/drivers/net/eepro100.c Sat Feb 10 02:49:43 2001
> +++ linux-dj/drivers/net/eepro100.c Sat Feb 10 03:05:06 2001
> @@ -550,10 +552,10 @@
> {
> unsigned long ioaddr;
> int irq, i;
> - int acpi_idle_state = 0, pm;
> - static int cards_found /* = 0 */;
> + int acpi_idle_state, pm;
> + static int cards_found;
> + static int did_version; /* Already printed version info. */
>
> - static int did_version /* = 0 */; /* Already printed version info. */
> if (speedo_debug > 0 && did_version++ == 0)
> printk(version);
>

Rejected. The maintainer clearly wanted the "/* = 0 */" present, yet
you remove them. I'm suspicious of the acpi_idle_state initialization
removal as well, but can't check it quickly at present (acpi_idle_state
is gone in my tree)

> diff -urN --exclude-from=/home/davej/.exclude linux/drivers/net/ncr885e.c linux-dj/drivers/net/ncr885e.c
> --- linux/drivers/net/ncr885e.c Sat Feb 10 02:49:44 2001
> +++ linux-dj/drivers/net/ncr885e.c Sat Feb 10 03:05:05 2001
> @@ -1163,7 +1163,7 @@
> }
>
> /* Since the NCR 53C885 is a multi-function chip, I'm not worrying about
> - * trying to get the the device(s) in slot order. For our (Synergy's)
> + * trying to get the device(s) in slot order. For our (Synergy's)
> * purpose, there's just a single 53C885 on the board and we don't
> * worry about the rest.
> */

rejected -- already in AC and my own patches

All the rest were applied.

Jeff

-- 
Jeff Garzik       | "You see, in this world there's two kinds of
Building 1024     |  people, my friend: Those with loaded guns
MandrakeSoft      |  and those who dig. You dig."  --Blondie
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/