Re: sysinfo.sharedram not accounted for on i386 ?

[Brian Grossman]

> On Mon, Feb 12, 2001 at 12:05:03AM -0700, Brian Grossman wrote:
> > On i386, sysinfo.sharedram is not accounted for, leading /proc/meminfo to
> > always report MemShared as 0.  Is this the intended behavior?
> 
> Yes.

Thanks.  Is there a preferred way of getting the equivalent info
as free(1) did under 2.2?

I've written a script to derive it from /proc/[0-9]*/statm, but that seems
like an awkward approach.  A related question: is the page size stored in
/proc somewhere?

Is there a discussion of this somewhere?  I couldn't find one when I
searched the linux-kernel archives.

Brian