Re: Writing on raw device with software RAID 0 is slow

Ben LaHaise (bcrl@redhat.com)
Thu, 1 Mar 2001 11:08:13 -0500 (EST)


On Thu, 1 Mar 2001, Stephen C. Tweedie wrote:

> Yep. There shouldn't be any problem increasing the 64KB size, it's
> only the lack of accounting for the pinned memory which stopped me
> increasing it by default.

Actually, how about making it a sysctl? That's probably the most
reasonable approach for now since the optimal size depends on hardware.

-ben

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/