Re: [CFT][PATCH] Re: fat problem in 2.4.2

Alexander Viro (viro@math.psu.edu)
Thu, 1 Mar 2001 16:07:32 -0500 (EST)


On Thu, 1 Mar 2001, Roman Zippel wrote:

> Hi,
>
> On Thu, 1 Mar 2001, Alexander Viro wrote:
>
> > +static int generic_vm_expand(struct address_space *mapping, loff_t size)
> > +{
> > + struct page *page;
> > + unsigned long index, offset;
> > + int err;
> > +
> > + if (!mapping->a_ops->prepare_write || !mapping->a_ops->commit_write)
> > + return -ENOSYS;
> > +
> > + offset = (size & (PAGE_CACHE_SIZE-1)); /* Within page */
> > + index = size >> PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT;
>
> For affs I did basically the same with a small difference:
>
> offset = ((size-1) & (PAGE_CACHE_SIZE-1)) + 1;
> index = (size-1) >> PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT;
>
> That works fine here and allocates a page in the cache more likely to be
> used.

The only difference is in the case when size is a multiple of
PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT, so most of the time it's the same, but yeah, this
variant is probably nicer.

The problem with putting it into ->truncate() is obvious -
handling errors. And doing the thing before vmtruncate() (in
foo_notify_change(), whatever) is also PITA - you need to
reproduce the rlimit handling. Not nice...

IOW, if it's worth doing at all it probably should be
on expanding path in vmtruncate() - limit checks are already
done, but old i_size is still not lost...
Cheers,
Al

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/