Re: Hashing and directories

Tim Wright (timw@splhi.com)
Fri, 2 Mar 2001 11:33:45 -0800


On Fri, Mar 02, 2001 at 10:04:10AM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
>
> xargs is very ugly. I want to rm 12*. Just plain "rm 12*". *Not* "find
> . -name "12*" | xargs rm, which has terrible issues with files names
>
> "xyzzy"
> "bla"
> "xyzzy bla"
> "12 xyzzy bla"
>

Getting a bit OffTopic(TM) here, but that's why the GNU versions of the tools
wisely added options to output '\0' rather than '\n' as a separator for the
data i.e.
find . -name '12*' -print0 | xargs -0 rm
does exactly what you want it to - no surprises.

The point about arbitrary limits, is, however well taken. The fact that the
space for exec args and environment historically was static and of a fixed
size is not a good reason to perpetuate the limitation.

Tim

-- 
Tim Wright - timw@splhi.com or timw@aracnet.com or twright@us.ibm.com
IBM Linux Technology Center, Beaverton, Oregon
Interested in Linux scalability ? Look at http://lse.sourceforge.net/
"Nobody ever said I was charming, they said "Rimmer, you're a git!"" RD VI
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/