Re: Larger dev_t

Jamie Lokier (lk@tantalophile.demon.co.uk)
Sun, 25 Mar 2001 19:00:59 +0200


Mitchell Blank Jr wrote:
> Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> > You are just delaying the problem then, at some point your uptime will
> > be large enough that you have run through all 64bit pids for example.
>
> 64 bits is enough to fork 1 million processes per second for over
> 500,000 years. I think that's putting the problem off far enough.

The year is 2006. IBM's latest supercluster has 1000 boxes, each with 4
x 8-way SMT processors running at 1THz. Dense optical interconnect
provides NUMA-style cache coherency, and the entire system runs like a
giant SMP box (using kernel data structure replication). Each active
thread is able to clone() 500,000,000 threads per second, in a pid space
shared throughout the cluster.

A virus arrives containing while(1){clone();}

Engineers observe pid wraparound approximately 2 weeks later :-)

-- Jamie
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/