Re: Serial port latency

Manfred Spraul (manfred@colorfullife.com)
Sun, 01 Apr 2001 00:09:34 +0200


This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------3736C7F42ABF3E1F14E70CD9
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Pavel Machek wrote:
>
> > >
> > > I've seen similar bugs. If you hook something on schedule_tq and
> > forget
> > > to set current->need_resched, this is exactly what you get.
> > >
> > I'm running with a patch that printk's if cpu_idle() is called while a
> > softirq is pending.
> > If I access the floppy on my K6/200 every track triggers the check, and
> > sometimes the console blanking code triggers it.
>
> Seems floppy and console is buggy, then.
>

No. The softirq implementation is buggy.
I can trigger the problem with the TASKLET_HI (floppy), and both net rx
and tx (ping -l)

> > What about creating a special cpu_is_idle() function that the idle
> > functions must call before sleeping?
>
> I'd say just fix all the bugs.
>

Ok, there are 2 bugs that are (afaics) impossible to fix without
checking for pending softirq's in cpu_idle():

a)
queue_task(my_task1, tq_immediate);
mark_bh();
schedule();
;within schedule: do_softirq()
;within my_task1:
mark_bh();
; bh returns, but do_softirq won't loop
; do_softirq returns.
; schedule() clears current->need_resched
; idle thread scheduled.
--> idle can run although softirq's are pending

I assume I trigger this race with the floppy driver.

b)
hw interrupt
do_softirq
within the net_rx handler: another hw interrupt, additional packets are
queued
do_softirq won't loop.
returns to idle thread. --> packets delayed unnecessary.

What about the attached patch? Obviously the other idle cpu must be
converted to use the function as well.

--
	Manfred
--------------3736C7F42ABF3E1F14E70CD9
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii;
 name="patch-proc"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline;
 filename="patch-proc"

--- 2.4/arch/i386/kernel/process.c Thu Feb 22 22:28:52 2001 +++ build-2.4/arch/i386/kernel/process.c Sun Apr 1 00:05:21 2001 @@ -73,6 +73,30 @@ hlt_counter--; } +/** + * cpu_is_idle - helper function for idle functions + * + * pm_idle functions must call this function to verify that + * the cpu is really idle. It must be called with disabled + * local interrupts. + * Return values: + * 0: cpu was not idle, local interrupts reenabled. + * 1: go into power saving mode, local interrupts are + * still disabled. +*/ +static inline int cpu_is_idle(void) +{ + if (current->need_resched) { + __sti(); + return 0; + } + if (softirq_active(smp_processor_id()) & softirq_mask(smp_processor_id())) { + __sti(); + do_softirq(); + return 0; + } + return 1; +} /* * We use this if we don't have any better * idle routine.. @@ -81,10 +105,8 @@ { if (current_cpu_data.hlt_works_ok && !hlt_counter) { __cli(); - if (!current->need_resched) + if (cpu_is_idle()) safe_halt(); - else - __sti(); } }

--------------3736C7F42ABF3E1F14E70CD9--

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/